Posted on 05/30/2019 9:55:10 AM PDT by NobleFree
SPRINGFIELD -- The state of Illinois is one step closer to legalizing recreational marijuana.
The Illinois Senate voted Wednesday to pass the bill, sending it to the House for consideration in the final two days of the session this week. The fast vote was 38-17, with two Republicans joining 36 Democrats in supporting it.
"This bill is going to set the model, I believe, the gold standard for how to approach social equity issues, relating (to) cannabis legalization," Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago, the bill's chief sponsor, said in her closing statement on the Senate floor.
The action Wednesday came just hours after a new, revised version of the bill was made public, and it is substantially different from the one Steans introduced on May 3, a proposal that sparked strong resistance from law enforcement, business groups and some local governments.
Like the original draft, the new bill, an amended version of House Bill 1438, provides that starting Jan. 1, 2020, Illinois residents could possess up to 30 grams, or roughly one ounce, of marijuana flower, 5 grams of THC concentrate and 5 grams of THC in a marijuana-infused product. It also authorizes the state to issue a limited number of licenses for cultivators, processors and retail dispensaries, and to charge excise taxes on the retail sale of marijuana products.
But other major provisions in the 622-page bill are substantially different from the original version, and those changes appeared to be key to gaining support and quelling some opposition.
For example, instead of enacting blanket, mass expungements of previous criminal records for minor marijuana-related violations, the new bill allows for expungement through the governor's clemency process if the case involves less than 30 grams of marijuana. For cases involving amounts greater than that, up to 500 grams, individuals and state's attorneys would be allowed to petition a court to vacate a conviction.
"Moving that off the table, I think, paved the way for us to resolve a bunch of other issues that were very important that weren't resolved initially," Sen. Jason Barickman, R-Bloomington, told reporters after a committee hearing on the bill Wednesday.
Among those other issues was a provision allowing people to grow up to five marijuana plants in their own homes, under certain conditions. While the original bill would have extended that right to all adults, the new bill limits it only to people who have been approved to use marijuana for medical purposes.
The new bill also preserves the right of employers to maintain "zero tolerance" policies on drug use and to establish drug-free workplaces. And it allows local governments to prohibit cannabis businesses in their communities, or to enact zoning regulations to control where they are located.
It also preserves the right of landlords to prohibit marijuana possession and use on their properties.
Among the senators from the suburbs, Democrats Melinda Bush of Grayslake, Cristina Castro of Elgin, Thomas Cullerton of Villa Park, Laura Ellman of Naperville, Ann Gillespie of Arlington Heights, Linda Holmes of Aurora, Julie A. Morrison of Deerfield and Laura M. Murphy of Des Plaines voted yes, while Republicans John F. Curran of Downers Grove, Donald P. DeWitte of St. Charles, Dan McConchie of Hawthorn Woods and Craig Wilcox of McHenry voted no.
Last week, a number of Northwest suburban Democrats had balked or wavered on the legislation, led by Rep. Marty Moylan of Des Plaines. The Daily Herald had reached out to 24 suburban Democrats; 12 responded, and of those, eight were uncommitted or disagreed with the legislation before it was revised.
Illinoisans cultivating their own weed was a deal-breaker for Murphy, who said last week she was worried about "the availability of roadside detection, and the current allocation of funding for local law enforcement."
For many supporters of legalization, the most important issues other than expungement involved what they called "social justice and equity" provisions. Among those are provisions that earmark 25 percent of the revenue generated to a grant program for reinvestment in low-income, high-minority neighborhoods.
It also gives preference in license applications to people who live in or have connections to neighborhoods characterized by high arrest rates for marijuana and other drug-related offenses.
Some opponents of the measure, however, said that provision was one of the reasons they voted against the bill.
"There is a limited number of licenses and we're going to give preference to vendors who are going to be in the poorest ZIP codes in Illinois," said Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet. "We're going to give preference to keeping poor people stoned."
In addition to funding community reinvestment grants, the bill calls for dedicating 35 percent of the revenue to the state general revenue fund, 20 percent for substance abuse prevention and mental health services, 10 percent to pay down the state's backlog of unpaid bills; 8 percent for local law enforcement, and 2 percent for public education and safety campaigns.
The good thing about marijuana is that, for the most part, potheads are pretty passive.
Thank You NobleFree.
So you can now legally smoke dope in public, but not regular cigarettes? Is marijuana smoke less harmful than tobacco smoke? AND WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN! SECOND-HAND SMOKE! GATEWAY TO SMOKING! [/s].
The article doesn't say or imply that.
So many equate legalization with compulsory use.
Legalization just means it is commercially available without penalty. Not MORE available.
Pot is everywhere, in every little town/county in the country.
Those who want to smoke it already are, whether legal or not.
So cigarettes and plastic straws are bad, but pot is good?
You should worry more about vaping, then.
Prohibition of pot hasn’t worked any better than it did for alcohol. Both can be abused but government can’t prevent that, but government can legalize, regulate, and tax it.
This movement will spread just like legal gambling. Politicians can’t resist the easy tax money.
It’s got nothing to do with the wishes of pot smokers. They are all smoking whether their states have made it legal or not.
In Colorado it’s illegal to allow yourself to be observed smoking pot openly even on your own property. Don’t know about other states.
“Pot is everywhere, in every little town/county in the country.
Those who want to smoke it already are, whether legal or not.”
And they have been for 50 years. It’s hilarious that people think people only start smoking if its legal. Those who want to smoke, smoke. Those that don’t want to smoke, don’t.
Legal has little to do with it, other than pot tourism, which leads to people taking pot back to their states where it’s illegal.
Something has to replace the lost revenue from less tobacco smokers.
Nowadays, when a politician does the right thing for the wrong reasons, that's the best we can hope for.
“Prohibition of pot hasn’t worked any better than it did for alcohol.”
I’d say that depends. For illegal pot dealers and government agencies paid to enforce prohibition, it’s been a cash cow.
Whores working different sides of the same street.
See...you get it.
States should decide these things not Fedzilla!
Been using cannabis daily since February 2015 & every aspect of my life has improved since!
https://www.carnivorecast.com/podcast/brett
Sure, and it's made you smarter, funnier, and better-looking too!
Hmmmmm no. But it did put me on the road to a much happier, mental illness free life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.