Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a little elbow grease

But if new evidence is found that points to intentional wrong doings then the old conclusions cannot be relied upon. Of a line of investigation was not prviously follwed to its end or if another investigation throws another light on previous investigations then surely the previous conclusions become highly suspect and can be revisited!?


4 posted on 05/30/2019 3:13:48 AM PDT by melsec (There's a track, winding back, to an old forgotten shack along the road to Gundagai..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: melsec
If a line of investigation was not previously followed to its end or if another investigation throws another light on previous investigations then surely the previous conclusions become highly suspect and can be revisited!?

_________________

Yes, that sounds reasonable.

7 posted on 05/30/2019 3:30:54 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it divine ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: melsec

“But if new evidence is found...”

Yes. New evidence. In the real world, i.e., not the Swamp, new evidence can be grounds for a new trial or investigation. Of course, that was in the olden days when a person was “presumed innocent until proven guilty.” Now Mueller has thrown that out the window and America is now Bizarro World.


12 posted on 05/30/2019 3:55:33 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson