I have a problem with Joe Digenova calling a man corrupt without spelling out the specific evidence.
“Questions” “Appears fishy” “Needs to explain himself” “Looks unethical” are all acceptable phrases to use....but if someone called me corrupt and they didn’t finish the paragraph with “
..when he took 10k dollars to...” or “When he met with and agreed to do...”
I would be straight up demanding we fist fight in the public square.
Not saying Digenovais incorrect....just he needs to back up all the shit he has been talking.
Everyone should, we have enough innuendo, we want facts and accountability.