Huber's tasks were to review (or investigate) and to report. Huber's tasks were not to review/investigate and to PROSECUTE. Can't prosecute without reviewing and investigating, right?
Do you know how the DOJ works?
Read haffast's post above for further information (#149).
You: Huber's tasks were to review (or investigate)…
And now you admit that "review" and "investigate" mean the same thing, essentially.
Baby steps. You'll get there.
(fyi, here's the ignorance you originally agreed with).
Pear-ord.45: Huber wasn’t assigned to do any further investigating. He was assigned to review what had been done and make recommendations as to what he concluded still needed to be done....
Ergo, no grand juries, no subpoenas , no indictments , no arrests and no convictions. Huber`s only task was review and report.
You: This.
😃
Can't prosecute without reviewing and investigating, right?I never said otherwise.
And now you admit that "review" and "investigate" mean the same thing, essentially.
I never said there was a difference. You are the one who implied that there was one in post #141.
Para-ord.45:
Huber wasn’t assigned to do any further investigating. He was assigned to review what had been done and make recommendations as to what he concluded still needed to be done.... Ergo, no grand juries, no subpoenas , no indictments , no arrests and no convictions. Huber`s only task was review and report.
FreeReign:
Still this!!
Review (investigate) and report. "ERGO no grand juries, no subpoenas , no indictments , no arrests and no convictions".