Give them “room to destroy.”
Get a rope.
I don’t buy PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE anymore, and support George Soros.
This article is spot on and dovetails with something I wrote here a couple of weeks ago on a thread about homelessness:
The dirty secret is that this is being done quite on purpose. The Activists pushing these laws will never admit it publicly but heres the truth.
They hate civilized society. Those beautiful glass and steel buildings with all the trappings of civilization? They hate them. They want them destroyed. All those middle class folks who drag their asses out of bed at 5am so they can be at work by 8? They hate them, too.
If youre one of them, blue collar, white collar, middle management, Senior VP, whatever, they hate you, too. They hate you with the white hot nuclear intensity of 10,000 burning suns. They hate the society that you help to build and they want it destroyed root and branch.
And while, for now at least, they cant just start killing us theyll make do with destroying the things that make civilized life possible. Theyll flood the productive parts of the cities with drug addled mentally ill people and then pass laws so you cant do a damned thing about it. Not legally, anyway.
Theyll make the areas so inhospitable to us normals that we flee taking our money, work ethic, and businesses with us. Then the spiral will tighten further damaging the things that they hate until the target area is laid waste.
These activists want things fouled with human waste, the parks and common areas unusable by the people who paid for them, and the cops prevented by law from doing anything about it. Once the water is undrinkable, the soil and sidewalks are covered with human feces, and the air stinking of rot, their task will be complete. At least in that area anyway.
Then theyll move on to the next target.
Face it. They hate you. They hate everything you believe in. They dont want compassion for these people. They need them. Theyre a weapon to be used against you.
Once you understand that everything becomes crystal clear.
See my tag line.
While I agree with most of the article, I disagree with the assertion that “no-fault divorce” is inherently bad or wrong.
Without no-fault—which AFAIK both parties have to agree to—a relatively amicable separation becomes very difficult, because both parties have to assert and defend wrong-doing. No one wins there except the lawyers.
The option of a divorce for cause still exists.
I suppose that it’s taboo to point out that what is being complained about, here, is the product of the thinking of women (in the majority) in the arena of politics (for which no government on Earth is structured).
We blindly hack at the US Constitution and state constitutions, undoing the work of dozens of thoughtful generations before, and then bitch and whine about the results.
They're like the miserable individuals everyone encounters now and then who want to drag everyone down to their level of misery and depravity, who denigrate and disparage everyone and everything--negative, nasty misfits.
Nothing makes them happy.
It’s impossible, because Progressives (liberals, the left, etc.) are perpetually unhappy; it is simply what they are. Unhappiness and pique are there default modes.
No. I want to make them corpses.
Surrogate child bearers vs genetic Mothers?
These people are so dang confused, they protest wearing handmaiden costumes and yet this idiotic is advocating for what that stupid story is about. Insane