Posted on 05/22/2019 1:54:14 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
A federal judge on Wednesday threw out a libel lawsuit against the conservative group Project Veritas and its founder James O'Keefe.
A woman who was assaulted outside a 2016 Trump rally filed the suit over how Project Veritas depicted in a video the events surrounding her assault.
Judge Martin Reidinger, who was appointed by former President George W. Bush, ruled that the video was protected under the First Amendment, according to the Asheville Citizen Times in North Carolina.
"While the internet has broadened the number and the variety of available voices in the marketplace of ideas, it has also served to undermine the public’s confidence in the veracity of those sources,” Reidinger said, according to The Washington Post, which cited a court transcript. “That fine line has to be walked. And I think that walking that fine line required this court to take a close look at what issues are really for this court and what issues are really for this jury.”
Reidinger determined that attorneys for Shirley Teter, 71, who filed the suit, did not prove actual malice.
O'Keefe celebrated the court's ruling on Twitter:
DIRECTED VERDICT! Federal Judge throws Teter vs Veritas out before it can get to Jury, on rule 50. ‘Jury could not find any clear and convincing evidence of actual malice’ Another Case dismissed. VERITAS!
Project Veritas, which is known for attempting to reveal purported liberal bias, was accused by Teter of setting up a private person for “ridicule, contempt, or disgrace."
Teter had been assaulted while protesting outside a Trump rally. After the incident, Project Veritas Action Fund posted the video, which it said showed Democratic activists planning to cause violence at Trump rallies, according to the Associated Press.
Teter's lawyers said in court that Democratic activist Scott Foval discussed plans in the video to place people at events so they could question Trump in front of reporters, according to the AP.
The attorneys argued that the video omitted Foval telling interviewers that the assault on Teter “was not preplanned” and “we haven’t paid a single person to get beat up at a rally."
They weren't set-up. Teter planned to cause trouble.
“There’s a script of engagement,” Foval said in the video.
“Sometimes the crazies bite and sometimes the crazies don’t bite...”
“The key is initiating the conflict by having leading conversations with people who are naturally psychotic. I mean, honestly, it’s not hard to get some of these assholes to pop off.”
“It’s a matter of showing up, to want to get into the rally, in a Planned Parenthood t-shirt. Or, Trump is a Nazi, you know… You can…. draw them to punch you.”
in a Planned Parenthood t-shirt. Or, Trump is a Nazi, you know… You can…. draw them to punch you.”
= = =
Wear a Bullseye - - - draw them to get more serious.
Or more likely nothing was omitted and Foval had said no such thing?
Or even if he had said such a thing, it’s not really relevant to what he was actually doing.
Attorneys are free to lie their asses off, not sworn in
There, I removed the liberal bias.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.