To: RatRipper
Actually, I believe the push to impeach will happen and it is being driven by RBG’s health. If they have ongoing impeachment hearings and she would die during them, I do believe they would argue that a POTUS under impeachment should not be allowed to seat a SC justice.
12 posted on
05/22/2019 8:17:26 AM PDT by
Toespi
To: Toespi
... they would argue that a POTUS under impeachment should not be allowed to seat a SC justice.Yet another "constitutional crisis."
14 posted on
05/22/2019 8:22:58 AM PDT by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: Toespi
Good point, but she was very ill long before this latest impeachment push gained much steam . . . but Trump has pummeled the liberal bastion of the 9th Circuit here in recent days. It certainly is at least a big part of their motivation.
To: Toespi
I hadn’t thought of THAT ANGLE. Could very well be!
20 posted on
05/22/2019 8:31:30 AM PDT by
buffyt
(Not a Choice, it's a CHILD in the womb. We may have aborted the person with the cure for cancer!)
To: Toespi
Now THERE’s something they might think of... (You’re not one of THEM, are you? :-D )
44 posted on
05/22/2019 9:23:12 AM PDT by
HeadOn
(Gooooooooooo, Barr!)
To: Toespi
they would argue that a POTUS under impeachment should not be allowed to seat a SC justice.
The POTUS doesn’t seat does he?
He just nominates, the Senate seats with it’s approval?
57 posted on
05/22/2019 11:53:14 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Toespi; Fedora
59 posted on
05/22/2019 1:46:44 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: Toespi
63 posted on
05/22/2019 8:52:20 PM PDT by
laplata
(The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson