Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Roe v. Wade’s overturn would have to consider the right to privacy as underpinning the original USSC decision. In the absence of such an explicit Constitutional (4th amendment) right, R.vW. would appear doomed and the abortion issue would return to the states for a bunch of individual legislative/judicial resolutions...pretty much the way 2nd amendment issues continue to be (hopefully) resolved.

No war. No way.


41 posted on 05/17/2019 11:37:04 AM PDT by yetidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: yetidog
Roe v. Wade’s overturn would have to consider the right to privacy as underpinning the original USSC decision. In the absence of such an explicit Constitutional (4th amendment) right, R.vW. would appear doomed and the abortion issue would return to the states for a bunch of individual legislative/judicial resolutions...pretty much the way 2nd amendment issues continue to be (hopefully) resolved.

I agree.

No war. No way.

I don't know about that. Liberals *HATE* and detest us in the manner that Massachusetts Puritans *HATED* Southern slave owners. Liberals see us as literally "untermenschen" with any violence used against us being completely justified in their minds. They have Armies of John Browns ready to assault us.

45 posted on 05/17/2019 11:42:18 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no o<ither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson