Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

While broadly speaking, Treason is a capital offense, just as killing someone is, broadly speaking, a capital offense, one would need to look at the specifics.

The object of those involved was to get Hillary elected, and those doing so thought that this was best for the U.S.

Someone who kills someone while driving drunk shouldn’t get the chair; someone committing this crime should be sent to a prison that has been subject to the prison equivalent of busing so that they may have prisonmates that reflect the cross-section of the American prison population. They should not receive the benefits of any white privilege.

Segregating prisoners into different prisons is racist unless all prisons have the same racial composition.


14 posted on 05/17/2019 4:38:14 AM PDT by Hieronymus ("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, to Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Hieronymus

That was only the objective of some of those committing treason. Much more was covering up their underlying treasonous crimes. (E.g., Uranium One, but many more, such as the real Benghazi story, etc.)

And the racial composition of prisons, etc., is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand, whatever sarcasm/parody intended.


17 posted on 05/17/2019 4:44:15 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Hieronymus
“Someone who kills someone while driving drunk shouldn’t get the chair...”

I disagree. If someone willingly takes a recreational drug with a weapon at hand for use while under that influence and USES that weapon against a innocent person, they should get the electric chair. The situation was premeditated.

19 posted on 05/17/2019 4:50:32 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Hieronymus
Segregating prisoners into different prisons is racist unless all prisons have the same racial composition.

Maybe so

But it is a tool used by the deep state

Read what the British court system did to Tommy Robinson

Robinson says that after being initially housed in a prison with a low Muslim population of just 7 percent, he was transferred to another prison with the largest Muslim population in the UK, and housed directly across from the mosque. Robinson tells Tucker: "What I'm known for is criticizing Islam, so there's been many planned attempts to murder me and kill me in this country."

He said he was placed in solitary confinement where he spent "two months not seeing or speaking to anybody," during which he lost 40 pounds from a diet of "one tin of tuna and a piece of fruit a day."

was supposed to be in Her Majesty's prison service, not Guantanamo Bay. I couldn't open my windows because I have excrement and spit put through them. I believe this whole piece - and, Tucker, this isn't the first So, every prisoner would walk past my cell window. Everyone, as they walk out. So, when my windows were open, every prisoner is walking past. But the mosque for the prison was directly opposite my cell. -Tommy Robinson

Robinson said he had to close his window amid sweltering heat spells to avoid all the excrement and spit flying into his cell from passersby. He also said, reluctantly, also admitted that he was diagnosed with a form of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which he has never spoken about publicly "because I don't want to insult members of the military who have witnessed war to try and compare to being locked in a cell in solitary confinement."

Robinson also describes his arrest, and claims his lawyer (solicitor) has evidence that authorities said he was being released - only to be jailed hours later.

27 posted on 05/17/2019 4:59:09 AM PDT by spokeshave (If anything, Trump is guilty of attempting to obstruct injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Hieronymus
"The object of those involved was to get Hillary elected, and those doing so thought that this was best for the U.S."

I'm not so sure they thought this was best for the U.S. They thought it was best for THEM. Now hillary appears to have been selling American secrets to our enemies by placing bargained for information on a server for our enemies access through fake hacking. If the Uranium one scandal can be traced to her I think she has committed treason. At a time of war I think she could possibly face capital punishment but under our current situation I think It would be long jail time, as in she won't ever get out if fully prosecuted and found guilty.

29 posted on 05/17/2019 5:06:44 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Hieronymus

Apparently they spied on Trump while he was President. This is clearly Espionage. They used foreign sources and assets in a blatant attempt to undo the election and overthrow the government. I think Treason is an accurate term.


44 posted on 05/17/2019 5:21:54 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Hieronymus
18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 115— TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

18 U.S. Code § 2383. Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

18 U.S. Code § 2384. Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

57 posted on 05/17/2019 5:41:02 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Hieronymus

“...or adhereing to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”


80 posted on 05/17/2019 6:17:08 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Hieronymus
The object of those involved was to get Hillary elected, and those doing so thought that this was best for the U.S.

Asinine. By that logic Communist or Islamist infiltrators would think their ideology "was best for the U.S."

They intended to overthrow our government from within - doesn't matter if they had happy-little-thoughts while they were committing evil.

142 posted on 05/17/2019 8:03:56 AM PDT by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson