Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rstrahan

> Assume Maine’s or Colorado, or any of the other states in this movement vote for Candidate A, but Candidate B gets the popular vote, the decision of the state’s voters is ignored. <

But those votes weren’t ignored. They were all counted, and then added to some total. Those votes did have an impact.

I actually feel bad arguing that this Popular Vote thing is constitutional. Because I think it’s a terrible idea, and a real threat to the Republic.


68 posted on 05/16/2019 7:16:24 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right
But those votes weren’t ignored. They were all counted, and then added to some total. Those votes did have an impact.

Hillary Clinton defeated Donald Trump by 4,269,978 votes, which is more than the combined total votes cast in Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Nebraska, and Kansas (all Trump states).

In New York, Clinton's excess vote count was 1,736,590. Illinois excess Clinton votes were 944,714. Massachusetts was 907,303.

In California, in just Los Angeles alone Clinton's excess vote count was 838,575.

-PJ

87 posted on 05/16/2019 8:39:37 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson