Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court requests response from Ohio and Michigan gerrymander challengers
RollCall ^ | May 13, 2019

Posted on 05/13/2019 12:45:18 PM PDT by SMGFan

The court gave the challengers a week to respond to requests from state officials to stop court-ordered redrawing of district lines

The Supreme Court on Monday gave the challengers of congressional maps in Ohio and Michigan until May 20 to respond to requests from state officials to stop court-ordered redrawing of district lines. Lower courts found the maps were partisan gerrymanders, an issue the high court is now considering in two other cases.

Lawmakers and officials in both states had argued that they did not have enough time to comply with recent federal court mandates to redraw their districts by June 14 in Ohio and Aug. 1 in Michigan.

“The court’s order is on the brink of throwing Michigan’s political system into unnecessary chaos,” Gary P. Gordon, counsel for the Michigan Senate, wrote in an affidavit submitted Friday.

New maps, if they were prepared, might have to be drawn again because the Supreme Court is expected to rule in coming weeks about similar cases in Maryland and North Carolina. It heard oral arguments about those states in March and a ruling is expected before the court’s term ends in June.

(Excerpt) Read more at rollcall.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 05/13/2019 12:45:18 PM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

been using computers to redistrict for over 30 years. Cannot take too long to crunch the numbers.


2 posted on 05/13/2019 12:47:49 PM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Partisan Gerrymandering is only OK when Democrats do it.

See?


3 posted on 05/13/2019 12:50:48 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Too bad Pennsylvania didn’t go this route. We could have saved the house.


4 posted on 05/13/2019 12:51:02 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Trump needs his best lawyers in these states, plus Pennsylvania, Florida and Wisconsin.

The attempt at voter fraud will be the worst in history in 2020.


5 posted on 05/13/2019 12:52:47 PM PDT by WashingtonFire (We stand for God, For Country and for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

You should only get 5 straight lines to draw district lines ,LOL


6 posted on 05/13/2019 12:53:27 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Each side calls it ‘gerrymandering’ when the other side does it, and has for nearly two centuries.

There can be no such thing as “NON-partisan gerrymandering”.


7 posted on 05/13/2019 12:59:58 PM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca. Deport all illegals. Abolish the DEA, IRS and ATF,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

A RECTANGLE is the only fair district.

Other schemes are racist.


8 posted on 05/13/2019 1:00:06 PM PDT by TheNext (Democrats Gun Control Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

But rectangles are not necessarily equal in population. So there will always be some distortion in shape and size


9 posted on 05/13/2019 1:03:41 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Nope.

Rectangles are true and fair.

Republicans and Conservatives are just math illiterate.


10 posted on 05/13/2019 1:06:01 PM PDT by TheNext (Democrats Gun Control Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Too bad Pennsylvania didn’t go this route. We could have saved the house.

Pennsylvania DID go this route. SCOTUS refused to get involved, because our state supreme court based their ruling on the state constitution and not the Federal one.


11 posted on 05/13/2019 1:11:05 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
You should only get 5 straight lines to draw district lines

At most, up to 5 straight lines ...

12 posted on 05/13/2019 1:12:28 PM PDT by BlueLancer (Orchides Forum Trahite - Cordes Et Mentes Veniant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The Dems need to worry. They get rid of gerrymandering the Congressional Black Caucus goes away.


13 posted on 05/13/2019 1:19:35 PM PDT by McGavin999 (Border security without a wall is like having a Ring doorbell without a doorw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

wards and districts for polling locations are not rectangles.

need a law saying a major city must not be split 3 ways by a congressional district unless pop requires it. And then when cutting up a city you must be compact. A city not be split if under 600 - 700K in pop.


14 posted on 05/13/2019 1:24:37 PM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

wards and districts for polling locations are not rectangles.

need a law saying a major city must not be split 3 ways by a congressional district unless pop requires it. And then when cutting up a city you must be compact. A city not be split if under 600 - 700K in pop.


15 posted on 05/13/2019 1:24:37 PM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Michigan Congressional Map 2012

16 posted on 05/13/2019 1:44:07 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Gerrymandering is a political issue. It should be up to the state supreme court. SCOTUS needs to stay out of it.


17 posted on 05/13/2019 1:48:56 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I’m in the 7th district, just below the 8 on the map.

The very best part of the state.


18 posted on 05/13/2019 1:55:47 PM PDT by Beagle8U (It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you place the blame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
It's about time SCOTUS gets a case to look at the NY gerrymandering that has put that slimbag Nadler in congress for decades.

He's only won in districts gerrymandered to fit a snake like him (see his last 2 below) and in fact his has been called "one of the ten most gerrymandered Congressional Districts in the country"

10th district (2013–present)

8th district (2003-2013)

19 posted on 05/13/2019 2:05:55 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker
There can be no such thing as “NON-partisan gerrymandering”.

The way to do this fairly would be to develop a computer program for redistricting well in advance of the next census. Base it strictly on non-political criteria: compactness, contiguity, a preference for respecting existing political subdivisions on the ground (cities, counties, etc.), and some neutral rule about things such as major rivers and mountains. Race should be excluded because race immediately becomes a proxy for political affiliation. The Democrats are attached to minority-majority districts and supermajority districts to provide safe havens for their imbecile caucus, and that practice would have to stop. This is why the Democrats will resist any genuinely neutral redistricting algorithm.

Bottom line: the system should be developed well in advance, accepted by both parties, and then rigorously implemented. No alterations permitted after the politicos have seen how the cookie crumbled.

20 posted on 05/13/2019 2:11:13 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson