Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
The constitutionality of compulsory vaccination has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court ever since Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).

At the same time the Supreme Court was upholding compulsory sterilizations based on "feeblemindedness" and/or race.

Wanna try to defend THAT?


33 posted on 05/08/2019 2:03:17 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog
At the same time the Supreme Court was upholding compulsory sterilizations based on "feeblemindedness" and/or race.

Those decisions have been overturned. The vaccination decisions have not.

Wanna try to defend THAT?

I'm "defending" nothing; I'm accurately reporting what the law is, as opposed to what I or others might wish it to be.

37 posted on 05/08/2019 2:10:35 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Why is keeping feebleminded from making more feebleminded kids a bad idea?

*segue*

Do you know why the world’s #1 importer of African slaves for many centuries doesn’t have a race problem today?

What say you Buck?


38 posted on 05/08/2019 2:12:57 PM PDT by null and void (The press is always lying. When they aren't actively lying, they are actively concealing the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson