Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; BroJoeK

You always want to lay this on Lincoln. What you keep forgetting is he was supported by the Republican lead congress. They passed laws and resolutions supporting his actions to suppress the rebellion.

The Republican party was founded, in part, on the destruction of slavery. It said so in their platforms of 1856 and 1860. No Republican (chase, seward) who won the nomination and the presidency would have just let the southern states go. Hell, President Buchanon, who was a pro-southern democratic, wouldn’t even let them go.


841 posted on 05/14/2019 3:56:25 PM PDT by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies ]


To: OIFVeteran
What you keep forgetting is he was supported by the Republican lead congress.

Which voted to strengthen protection for slavery through the Corwin amendment. This action makes it clear that neither side cared about slavery.

Both sides accepted it as the norm going forward.

No Republican (chase, seward) who won the nomination and the presidency would have just let the southern states go.

I'm glad you said this. I interpret it to mean that one way or another, the Union was going to fight them to stop them from leaving.

No one was going to let them leave in peace. And why is that? We let the Philippines go. We let Cuba go. We still tell Puerto Rico they can leave if they wish.

What was it about the money producing Southern states that made them so important to the Union government?

843 posted on 05/14/2019 4:39:19 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 841 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson