Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x
There were idealists who didn't mind the idea of dying for the country and for freedom, and they weren't necessarily "radical abolitionists."

That's exactly what I'm saying: they were fighting to preserve the union, not for abolition of slavery. That's why the Emancipation Proclamation just muddied the political waters.

696 posted on 05/09/2019 6:57:56 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies ]


To: ek_hornbeck

Yes it was about preserving the Union and also more than that. There was a lot of anger in the north at the south for seceding. Even more after they fired on and captured Fort Sumter. To the Unionist the southern states annulled an election that they lost fair and square. Many unionist saw this as a dastardly, dishonorable act. It reeked of unfairness and disrespect, to put it in modern language it was a big F*&^ you to the United States. Secession busted norms and broke associations that had been in effect for decades, and did so unilaterally.


713 posted on 05/09/2019 4:21:09 PM PDT by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson