Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird
That fort sat on South Carolina’s sovereign territory and those ships entered South Carolina’s sovereign territorial waters.

But on land deeded to the federal government free and clear by act of the South Carolina legislature. Why shouldn't the government have a right to resupply it?

290 posted on 05/04/2019 3:38:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

“But on land deeded to the federal government free and clear by act of the South Carolina legislature. Why shouldn’t the government have a right to resupply it?”

Because due to the power of Eminent Domain, South Carolina claims it. So it wasn’t federal any more nor was any other federal installation in a sovereign state which had seceded.


297 posted on 05/04/2019 7:26:07 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg
But on land deeded to the federal government free and clear by act of the South Carolina legislature.

King George owned all the land of the Colonies. Independence invalidated all of that.

337 posted on 05/04/2019 10:53:47 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson