Replies

Pretty much blows Q/Sessions “secret sting” out of the water.

Believe it or not, LS, the "secret sting" theory that I THINK you're talking about is not a Q thing.

It may have been discussed by some Q aficionados as a possible interpretation of Q, but it was not a fully accepted one. I know this because I'm involved in the conversation and I never bought into the Mueller/[RR] "white hat/secret sting" theory and know that Q NEVER said anything like that.

So, to make a comment like you just did, attributing some kind of "secret sting" to Q, is false.

But because SOME Q researchers buy into that theory, people like you and the derp media use that fact point to discredit" Q.

Aren't you better than that? Before making judgements you should know of which you speak.

I really like your attitude, LS, and know that your heart is in the right place. But knowing how wrong you are when you make statements like this makes me lose respect for your thoroughness.

It's like, if you are careless with your thoughts and theories as you are here, what else are you careless and thoughtless about.

Ya dig?

But because SOME Q researchers buy into that theory, people like
you and the derp media use that fact point to discredit" Q.

So if Sri Chaitanya of Bengal (1486-1533), founder of Hare
Krishna never actually said that they should hang around
airports ringin' bells and annoying people... then that
means they aren't really officially doing so?

Since brer Chaitanya isn't around to say otherwise and we
must depend upon the interpretation of his "drops" by the
faithful and them faithfuls are dancin' around in airports
then we must conclude that this behavior is in line with
the "drops" of Chaitanya.

I'd really rather have used the Moonies for this, since Moonie
is 'way funnier than Hare Krishna but them Moonies seem a pretty
dull lot. I'll work 'em in somewhere down the line.

Well, those “afficionados” are the leading Qsters on twitter, although they don’t specifically call themselves that out of (I think) concern for what’s left of their reputations.

Aren’t you better than that? Surely you read these people.

If you are careless with this kind of defense of Q, how careless are you with other facts?

Speaking of facts, you do know that there has not been one single new bed added in Gitmo, that not ONE new prisoner has been taken there in a couple of years, that the only facility expansion is a judge-mandated lawyer/client conference area, and that all this has been reported both by the Miami Herald reporter on the scene and by a source I have who is in charge of vetting EVERY new arrival?

Contra Q.