Posted on 04/23/2019 5:01:54 AM PDT by reaganaut1
The muzzie savages don't make excuses, so the lefties do it for them as a form of justification and an excuse not to eradicate the b@st@rds!
Thank you!
There were 7-8 suicide bombers involved. The idea this was thrown together in the 30 or so days since Christchurch is obviously complete BS to anyone with half a brain.
So why is the WSJ printing it?
The message is: don’t go making muslims angry or they will go on a killing spree beyond all comprehension.
The NZ attacker clearly was NOT Catholic.
And the excuse/reason for all the church bombings and attacks before and since Christchurch?
Doing the same thing almost every other media outlet is doing, giving cover to the muslims. They are trying to downplay their involvement, and trying to blame white Christains, by saying this is a muslim reaction to the bad Christans attacking their mosque in NZ. Its horseshit, this was planned months ago.
I’m gonna have to call BULLSH*T on that. That’s a convenient excuse for a great number of things, most prominently, not doing your f*cking job. They were, apparently, told about it and did nothing. A whole lot of egg on the face and even more blood on the hands of that country’s leadership. Blaming this on what happened in New Zealand is a convenient excuse.
All of this is solved by kicking any muslim out of your country and letting them live with their brethren in the sh*thole country of their choice.
This is coming to cities near all of us, at some point. If/when it does happen, it happens while the current occupant of the White House, President Trump, is in office and the country hasn’t slid into the abyss by electing someone like Sanders, Booker, Harris, whoever.
Actually, I think it’s more a matter of the fact that they like killing anyone who ain’t them, whether it be Westerners, Christians, Hindus, etc., etc., etc.
Which will not fall on deaf ears in the media.
Ever notice that when the US had a policy of letting it be known there were some things you better not do because if you did something would happen to you which you will not be happy about? See, we are above that now, we just wave our fists and say bad bad but nothing ever happens.
They’re going to push this too far at some point and wake up the West. They won’t like the results.
http://www.europeanamericansunited.org/school1/Fiction/kipling/awakened.htm
So retaliation is OK?
Watch your step.
Baloney! Any excuse to blow up others in the name of their god ... that’s what it’s really about. They’ve been waging war on other countries for centuries.
As always, those dang Christians. /sarc
I for one am not buying that explanation. Those who believe it are being duped. This was business as usual for such terrorists. It was both an attack on Christians and a warning to others Christians that even churches are not safe. Terrorists also aim to destabilize governments. Attacks on innocents which police and other officials were powerless to prevent certainly makes people question the government.
This was not a retaliation.
and all the bowing and butt kissing in New Zealand after the attack was just bowing and butt kissing
Death and mayhem are “in the DNA” of Mohammedanism. It has been on the warpath from the beginning.
The best accounting on the Sri Lanka bombings posted here in FR thus far has been by robowombat in FR appears here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3743937/posts#13
Yeah, if this was coordinated by even a reasonably sized group, I sort of have a hard time believing it’s just a reaction to NZ.
They tried to plan it for a while. NZ just gave extra gumption.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.