If so, there is absolutely no way that is constitutional
“If so, there is absolutely no way that is constitutional”
I think the issue is if you are a SSA recipient and you have someone else handling the money involved for you, it opens a way to have a “legal proceeding” to determine your mental competence. It is a very broad “net” that would “ensnare”
people who were say on travel and had asked a family member to look after their financial affairs while they were away. Face it, day by day, hour by hour, every f*cking RAT legislator, mayor, or dog catcher, is looking for sometimes minute ways to abridge your Second Amendment Rights and have some Marxist Judge say that it’s o.k. And so, I think it’s long past time for The SCOTUS to get up off their worthless, overpaid, underworked a$$es and give a complete pass on the entire Bill of Rights. That there are NO Exceptions, absent actual disqualifying criminal activity, found through a complete court proceeding and appeals process, to take away ANY of those enumerated Rights. And we should couple that with Federal Preemption of all State and Local Gun Laws that have the effect of infringing on our Second Amendment Rights. So that would not have any effect on states whose gun laws were 2A “supportive” as would be the case with any state law which said that the 2A says what it says and that we have no issue with anything less.
Neither the gun ban nor social security is constitutional
“If so, there is absolutely no way that is constitutional”
Unfortunately in today’s world “constitutional” is whatever 5 Supreme Court justices determine is constitutional. The actual meaning of the words is irrelevant.