Replies

After he took a dive in that televised debate with Obama over foreign policy by failing to so much as mention Benghazi, I became convinced that he did not want to win the race for the White House.

The RNC went all-in behind the one person on earth who could not run against ObamaCare, because he passed the same thing, RomneyCare, in MASS. That took the top issue off the table. Then Mitt tossed the second one away, never once mentioning Benghazi. Tough to win when you "unintentionally" bench your two best players.

The RNC must have been paid a LOT of money to throw that election.

59 posted on 04/19/2019 7:21:11 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)

Looking back at the 2012 GOP Primary... Santorum wins Iowa, but gets 0 delegates? Third place Ron Paul gets 22 of the 28? Huh? (Rick 25%, Mitt 25%, Paul 22%, Newt 13%

Santorum does poorly in the next 4 weeks in the 4 primaries (NH, SC, FL, NV), winning zero, and getting zero delegates...

but then on FEB 7 (Primaries for CO MO MN), he wins ALL THREE primaries, and gets only 21 delegates out of 103??? 82 delegates go to other candidates???

He had an outright majority in Missouri at 55%... Mitt at 25%, Paul at 12% and Newt at 1% all get delegates, and he gets only 13 of 49???

Santorum finishes with more than double Ron Paul's total primary votes, 24% to 11%, but gets only 38 to Paul's 98 delegates?

How did we not notice this?? How much did the RNC cheat to force Mittens on us, and then to throw the election to Obama?

63 posted on 04/19/2019 7:39:04 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794