A crackpot?
You can call him overheated, passionate, loud, often too angry, but he is no crackpot. The Miriam-Webster definition of “crackpot” is: one given to eccentric or lunatic notions.
He is neither eccentric nor a lunatic. He is however extremely angry about this, and justifiably so. He is spot on with any analysis he has done on it.
We should all be damned angry about this. I am.
He’s ALWAYS angry. That is no the sign of a winner IMO.
If I was on the other side, I would think, I’ve got enough problems. Whatever he has, I don’t want.
Agreed,
Levin is BRILLIANT!
His Tone and Passion
Are His Trademarks.
Yes,he scares kids
and small dogs.
See post 55.
He’s a crackpot even if he is right on some things.
Now, if you want to defend him you can try, but be aware that to do so you will also have to defend the notion that the people who insist on sealing the border without amnesty are antisemites. That is not negotiable, and if you go that route you will be defending that assertion not just on this thread but on future threads.
He never took back that assertion at the Treehouse.
Your choice.
#22. Yes, and Levin is one helluva lot smarter lawyer than Dan Abrams and his motley crew together will ever be.