The irony is thick here, as Weissman was the lead prosecutor in Arthur Anderson. And got spanked by SCOTUS for misconduct in that case.
I believe that Weidman bulldog Mueller’s ‘essay’. There was nothing legal about it. The premise for Weisman in the Arthur Andersen case was that they did not prove their innocence. In our system of Justice, there is a presumption of innocence and the burden falls on the Prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. How do you prove innocence anyway?