I don’t often agree with the party elites but in this case they are right. He is damaged goods. Even setting aside the creepy allegations involving his personal life, he is a certified wing nut. The man is a Dominionist, who is on the record as stating that the Holy Bible (presumably his interpretation) takes precedence over all man made laws including the US Constitution.
He is wack job and patently unfit for any office of public trust.
Seriously? They are wrong about everything else, but on this you feel confident they are right?
When you find yourself agreeing with the enemy, you should reevaluate your conclusions.
The smears against Moore are driven by the media system, and specifically by that lying bitch Stephanie McCrummen of the Washington Post, who made up that bullsh*t lying story about Rick Perry (Governor of Texas) and the N***er rock smear.
Yes, McCrummen dragged up the suicidal drug addicted slut trash from Alabama to make false accusations against Moore.
They "Kavanaughed" Moore before they did it to Kavanaugh, and so many people bought it. In fact, it worked so well against Moore, that's why they thought these same lying tactics would work against Kavanaugh. The only difference is the Republican leadership did not deliberately stab Kavanaugh in the back the way they did Moore.
A dominionnist is different from someone who believes in the supremacy of the word of God. The Hebrew midwives “feared God” and refused to implement Pharoah’s “man made law” to kill the male Hebrew children. Would that have made Christians “dominionists’ if such laws existed to day and we refused to go along with them? Would that make Christians unfit for office?
A Dominionist believes that Christianity in the main is the “replacement Israel” that will eventually crowd out and replace all religious and secular ordinances, much like how islamists also believe that Islam will do the same. Dominionism is not supported by scripture but Christians are adjured to live by the principles of scripture and by the example of Jesus Christ and to sometimes die for those truths when they clash with secular priorities(as in historical Rome and the persecutions).
Messiah will rule out of Jerusalem someday...not dominionism but that will be on God’s timetable and all people will be subject to his rule.
Your argument does point out the tenuous position even Christians find themselves under our constitution when living for the truth starts to be viewed as “unconstitutional” to do so such as holding an antithetical view towards homosexuality and any hetero-sex outside of the confines of marriage. Memorial crosses are challenged in the courts. Christian bakers and florists are sued for their positions. Senator Booker attempted to apply a religious test to a female federal judge candidate as she was religiously Catholic.
The founding fathers said that the constitution was made for a people who held in the main a religious Judeo-Christian consensus and when that consensus is lost, then the constitution would hold no value for evil men(and women as well, it appears) given over to tyrannical passions.
We will wish for the “man on a white horse” if only to restore order even order enforced by a predictable tyranny.(for example...in Russia, a poll came out which showed a majority of Russians supporting the memory of Stalin, given the chaos and corruption rampant in their country presently)