Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

As a judge of a lower circuit you don’t get to pick and choose what statutes you wish to follow from the upper courts. That my friend is what we call judicial tyranny and if I’m not mistaken what most around here bemoan about incessantly.


113 posted on 04/18/2019 4:27:02 PM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Jarhead9297
As a judge of a lower circuit you don’t get to pick and choose what statutes you wish to follow from the upper courts.

These were not "statutes". In fact, the ruling by the Federal judge conflicted with actual statutes passed by the Alabama legislature.

These were dictatorial nonsense rulings imposed by idiot Liberal Judges of the Federal judiciary, and they were legally incorrect, and demonstrably so.

That my friend is what we call judicial tyranny and if I’m not mistaken what most around here bemoan about incessantly.

You are on the wrong side of this. The judicial tyranny is the crap Federal judges impose on states that don't want it. Moore stood up to this. Most judges just cower in fear and order the will of the Federal judge be done.

I think one of the rulings from the Federal tyrants was regarding making the state of Alabama force f@ggot marriage on the people of Alabama, and in direct contradiction to Alabama statutes which prohibited it.

123 posted on 04/18/2019 5:00:45 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson