It’s voluntary to live in the housing, they can make whatever rules they want.
It’s voluntary to live in the housing, they can make whatever rules they want.
You can’t violate someone’s constitutional rights no matter where they live.
You’re missing a bit of the Constitution.
I guess they must also quarter the military.
East Saint Louis, Illinois, is probably one of the worst slums in America, and the most disreputable scum manage to survive there. It is so bad, I don’t think they even resettle Third World refugees there.
There are some relatively decent people who do live there, but they are trapped like flies in a spider web. Self-defense is their ONLY defense, as the cops are not exactly the most responsive there.
What about “homeless” people?
Is it possible to even purchase a firearm without an address? I always thought that would be an interesting legal dilemma.
But the housing is still in the US and the Constitution is valid there too.