[flamberge]

Not counting the Electoral votes from democrat states would, I believe be the beginning of CWII—especially if not counting their votes changed the outcome of the Presidential election. I know the dems seem to be willing to take such a risk.

The Democrats have chosen to believe that they will win a Civil War. They will not be persuaded otherwise and for this reason, there is no limit to what they will do to remove President Trump.

Of course, they would prefer that their opponents surrender to rigged elections under a Pretense-of-Law. But Congressman Swalwell (D-California) openly threatened to use nuclear weapons on American citizens if they refuse to obey the Democrats demand for confiscation of firearms. This can be dismissed as a hyperbole. But everybody knows what he meant.

Once Rule-of-Law is gone, there are no limits for anybody.

[hanamizu]

Once Rule-of-Law is gone, there are no limits for anybody.

---

The dems are OK with the “Rule of Law” as long as they are writing the laws. It’s frightening. Dem states are passing laws to protect abortion up until (and perhaps a bit after) birth—and celebrating the vote with cheers, applause, and lit up buildings while at the same time conservative states are passing ‘heartbeat’ laws.

California is outraged that for a week Californians could legally buy firearm magazines that are standard capacity in most states. Blue states are passing laws forbidding purchase of firearms by adult 18-20 year-olds while Red states are passing Constitutional carry laws. It seems that there is no middle ground.

I fear for the Republic.