The Supreme Court was pretty clear.
You can’t force your perversion on us.
Rather, SCOTUS fostered such by making it illegal in every state not to recognize homosexual marriage, and was was far from clear inb the Masterpiece case, choosing to use the hostility towards Phillips as the reason for its verdict, rather than vindicating him as they should have.
Kennedy's decision specifically noted the hostility towards Phillips made by the Commission as their reason to reverse the ruling, but because of the existence of this hostility in the current case, they could not rule on the broader issue regarding anti-discrimination law and the free exercise of religion. Kennedy stated that "[t]he outcome of cases like this in other circumstances must await further elaboration in the courts,...Kennedy's decision affirmed that there remains protection of same-sex couples and gay rights which states can still enforce through anti-discrimination laws, a point also agreed to by Ginsburg's dissent - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission#Analysis
Yet here is a case in which a baker refused to become complicit in celebrating a marriage that is not recognized by the law of God nor was it recognized by the highest law of the state at the time. But who was vindictively persecuted and prosecuted by the kangaroo Civil Rights commission.