[daniel1212]

if the vendor guidelines were re-written for the express purpose of banning the family such punitive actions do not usually pass the smell test in court.

Normally true, but the downward trajectory of Liberal courts is on that makes a stench from Hell to be a protected fragrance.

History and tradition guide and discipline the inquiry but do not set its outer boundaries. When new insight reveals discord between the Constitution’s central protections and a received legal stricture, a claim to liberty must be addressed. [=] Same-sex couples have the same right as opposite-sex couples to enjoy intimate association...[=] they too may aspire to the transcendent purposes of marriage. - Obergefell v. Hodges Kennedy Opinion.

[lastchance]

Alas, so many judges are tainted with support for the culture of death.

On Obergell. That opinion has never made one bit of sense to me. I am surprised that a solid document such as the Constitution could be stretched so out of shape without snapping in two. Though I rather think that may be the goal of the Left.

Come to think of it since when has sexual intimacy been an unfettered right for anybody?