Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Alger Hiss Democrats in Congress
Townhall.com ^ | April 11, 2019 | Emmett Tyrrell

Posted on 04/11/2019 9:07:27 AM PDT by Kaslin

WASHINGTON -- Well, I guess I have been right all along. Others have been saying that special counsel Robert Mueller was going to be swept up by the Kultursmog and become a tool of Hillary Clinton's conspiracy. She said Russian hackers were the cause of her defeat -- see page 395 of "Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign" -- and she ordered her media to investigate.

Hillary's explanation for her defeat has been that the Russians colluded with the Trump team to fashion her defeat. After all, she has been a lifelong enemy of Moscow, almost a member of The John Birch Society. Mueller and the Camorra of Clinton supporters that he surrounded himself with must come to her aid now. They would reveal that Trump and the Russians were in collusion to steal her election.

There is only one problem with this conspiracy. For two long years, after every leak, after every tantalizing tale of collusion, never was there discovered any evidence of it. Thus, that is what Mueller reported. There was no evidence. The media and the Clintonites had a lovely theory of collusion. All that was missing was the evidence, and that is what Mueller reported. As I say, I was right all along. Mueller was an honest man.

So now what are the Democrats going to do? Are they going to move on to something else, or are they going to fabricate another lie? They are going to fabricate another lie. They are going to claim that Attorney General William Barr's revelations are a "cover-up." Notwithstanding the law and customs surrounding a grand jury's treatment of evidence gathered, they are going to claim the right to lay eyes on every jot and tittle Mueller obtained and handed over to Barr. Even irrelevant data that might hurt the "reputational" interests of "peripheral" figures who happen to be ensnared in the grand jury's findings -- say, an Uber driver or a witness who blurted out his love for chicken kiev.

The Democrats are going to do what they have done for years when they have been really desperate. They are going to follow the time-honored strategy of one of their own. Insiders call it the Alger Hiss strategy. They will lie fervently, sincerely and forever. They will never give an inch. They will lie unto death. They have implemented the Alger Hiss strategy with the Mueller revelations. His report was sufficient to allay the suspicions of most objective readers, but there are always some suckers out there, and those are the Democrats' targets.

So now the Democrats will ask for every word to be unredacted by Attorney General Barr. They will come up with some new figures that the report mentions, say, the aforementioned Uber driver. They will come up with a janitor from Trump Tower. They will come up with some poor wretch who has never heard of Trump Tower. That is pretty suspicious, no?

The wretches are there. Believe me. Some are in high office. Think of Congressman Adam Schiff. Think of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, or -- excuse me -- Congressgirl Ocasio-Cortez. They already believe the party line on Attorney General Barr and special counsel Mueller. It is actually a very touching fealty to the party line to see such credulity.

American historians, of whom I am certainly one of the foremost, have observed the Alger Hiss Strategy since the late 1940s and early 1950s when Hiss, an aide to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt at the Yalta conference, said he was not a communist and had never lied under oath. He was duly packed off to the hoosegow for perjury. Yet that was not the end of it. It was only the beginning. Alger continued to lie in and out of jail. As he continued to lie through the years, he gathered more and more Democratic support, even independent support. A cottage industry of books, pamphlets and other documentation came to Hiss's support. One would think the controversy was over at the end of the Cold War when historians could get into the Soviets' archive and prove the old boy was a communist. Hiss was a communist.

Alas, it was not over. Hiss was dead. Communism was dead. Yet the Democrats had learned something very powerful from Hiss's life's work. If you lie, lie fervently, lie sincerely and lie forever, there are credulous saps who will believe you. It does not matter how preposterous your story is. These poor saps will not only believe the lies; they will actually acquire a kind of moral and intellectual superiority by believing it.

So when you encounter a fellow or a fellowess who becomes enflamed about what a scoundrel or an idiot Attorney General Barr is, do not be surprised. He, she or it is in thrall to the Alger Hiss strategy. Offer the poor sap a glass of warm milk.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: algerhiss; williambarr

1 posted on 04/11/2019 9:07:28 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Hillary's explanation for her defeat has been that the Russians colluded with the Trump team to fashion her defeat. After all, she has been a lifelong enemy of Moscow, almost a member of The John Birch Society. Mueller and the Camorra of Clinton supporters that he surrounded himself with must come to her aid now. They would reveal that Trump and the Russians were in collusion to steal her election. There is only one problem with this conspiracy. For two long years, after every leak, after every tantalizing tale of collusion, never was there discovered any evidence of it. Thus, that is what Mueller reported. There was no evidence. The media and the Clintonites had a lovely theory of collusion. All that was missing was the evidence, and that is what Mueller reported... So now what are the Democrats going to do? Are they going to move on to something else, or are they going to fabricate another lie? They are going to fabricate another lie.

2 posted on 04/11/2019 9:13:22 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The #1 rule of con men: Never ever give up the con no matter what.


3 posted on 04/11/2019 9:14:48 AM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Alger Hiss DemocRats?

Really?

Deal!! Here's Yellowcake in your eye!!


4 posted on 04/11/2019 9:17:57 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If you lie, lie fervently, lie sincerely and lie forever, there are credulous saps who will believe you. It does not matter how preposterous your story is. These poor saps will not only believe the lies; they will actually acquire a kind of moral and intellectual superiority by believing it.”

OJ after all was acquitted in the criminal trial.....


5 posted on 04/11/2019 9:24:05 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Seditious Stalinist snakes


6 posted on 04/11/2019 9:45:08 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Stalinists lie. Always


7 posted on 04/11/2019 9:45:37 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Alger Hiss, like the Rosenbergs, was an "honest traitor" who did his duty (as he saw it: to his Soviet "homeland") to the end. The Soviet instruction to their agents was to never confess. Deny, deny, deny. Fight by all means possible, fair or foul, and beat the rap if possible, but never concede an inch. If necessary, go the electric chair proclaiming your innocence, no matter how damning the evidence against you. Meanwhile the Party, if it deemed the situation exploitable, would craft a propaganda narrative around you, and useful idiots would believe it.

When the left took over the democratic party in the 70's and 80's, this attitude moved from the communist fringe into the mainstream of democrat/media message discipline. The left now lies as a matter of routine, and the brazenness of the lie no longer matters.

8 posted on 04/11/2019 10:20:58 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
When Soviet SPY Algier Hiss sued Whittaker Chambers the founder of Time Magazine (Henry Luce) paid all his defense attorney bills.

William F Buckley tried to get Whittaker Chambers to start the magazine National Review with him, Chambers declined.

The book Witness by Whitter Chambers is one of the best books ever.
(And, I'm not kidding)

9 posted on 04/11/2019 10:31:02 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
“In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is...in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.” -- Theodore Dalrymple [Wiki attributes this to Anthony Daniels, TD is his nom de plume]

10 posted on 04/11/2019 10:48:06 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

BFL


11 posted on 04/11/2019 11:08:30 AM PDT by rlmorel (If racial attacks were as common as the Left wants you to think, they wouldn't have to make them up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The book Witness by Whittaker Chambers is one of the best books ever.

I concur. I hope many people are encouraged by your assessment and read the book to find out for themselves.

12 posted on 04/11/2019 3:30:40 PM PDT by pilipo (We are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldbux

* * *


13 posted on 04/12/2019 5:41:05 PM PDT by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. — Alfred Tarski, 1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Mueller was an honest man.

Not sure I'd go quite that far - he did, after all, hold his results until after the '18 election. An honest man would not have done that.

But yes, people who believe that there is no truth, only narrative, can cling guiltlessly to a complete lie. When you hear someone invoking "My truth" you've got a live one there.

14 posted on 04/12/2019 5:49:13 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson