Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
If too many individual purple states (if it happened in a red state that would be surprising) each changed their laws to allocate electors based on the national popular vote that would be very dangerous. And they would not need a US Constitutional amendment to do it.

Correct - the only Constitutional issue is states entering into a compact to do so. But there's no evidence that even the blue-est state is willing to so decide without a compact.

42 posted on 04/09/2019 7:23:40 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: NobleFree
A blue state allocating electors proportional to the national popular vote would tend to lose electoral votes for the dems. A blue state giving all its electors the the winner of the national popular vote would not change the electors for that state. Maine switching to winner-take-all based on either the national, or statewide popular vote might make a small difference.

The danger is that the red and blue states keep their current systems but the purple ones change to winner-of-the-national-popular-vote-take-all. I expect the big metro areas to keep getting bigger and voter fraud to get worse.

43 posted on 04/09/2019 7:48:38 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson