To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
If too many individual purple states (if it happened in a red state that would be surprising) each changed their laws to allocate electors based on the national popular vote that would be very dangerous. And they would not need a US Constitutional amendment to do it. Correct - the only Constitutional issue is states entering into a compact to do so. But there's no evidence that even the blue-est state is willing to so decide without a compact.
42 posted on
04/09/2019 7:23:40 AM PDT by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
A blue state allocating electors proportional to the national popular vote would tend to lose electoral votes for the dems. A blue state giving all its electors the the winner of the national popular vote would not change the electors for that state. Maine switching to winner-take-all based on either the national, or statewide popular vote might make a small difference.
The danger is that the red and blue states keep their current systems but the purple ones change to winner-of-the-national-popular-vote-take-all. I expect the big metro areas to keep getting bigger and voter fraud to get worse.
43 posted on
04/09/2019 7:48:38 AM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson