It is a big deal if the Illinois Supreme Court rules that FOID cards are infringements on the Second Amendment.
1 posted on
04/01/2019 9:48:44 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Lady with a clean record, in possession of a single shot, bolt action rifle .22 in the home for personal protection. If gun-grabbers had their way, but were forced to provide some deference to the Second Amendment, that .22 Cricket would be the only allowable firearm.
2 posted on
04/01/2019 10:01:31 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: marktwain
Judge ruled requiring a license and charging a fee/tax to exercise a Constitutional right in the home unconstitutional.
just in the home ?
3 posted on
04/01/2019 10:02:16 AM PDT by
stylin19a
(2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: marktwain
I checked carefully; the Second Amendment doesn’t mention FOIDs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson