I am sorry but you are wrong. If that were the case, “faithless” electors would be “unconstitutional” and hence unlawful. They are not.
“I am sorry but you are wrong. If that were the case, “faithless” electors would be “unconstitutional” and hence unlawful. They are not.”
Ok, so wouldn’t these states be introducing another constitutional issue then, forcing electors to vote against their will and submitting to the national popular vote instead of honoring the will of the state’s voters and the party’s candidate they’ve pledged they’re committed to?