Posted on 03/27/2019 7:21:18 PM PDT by Rebelbase
A maritime official says the engines of a cruise ship failed off Norway's coast during a storm because they didn't have enough lubricating oil.
Lars Alvestad, the head of Norway's Maritime Authority, said Wednesday that low oil levels were the "direct cause" of the engine failure that stranded the Viking Sky on Saturday.
Alvestad says safety systems detected the problem and automatically stopped the engines to prevent a breakdown.
Viking Sky's crew sent a mayday call and anchored in heavy seas to keep the ship from being dashed on rocks in an area known for shipwrecks. Five helicopters lifted 479 passengers off with winches.
(Excerpt) Read more at wfaa.com ...
Disconnect the sensors and Slick-50 that B and she’ll never stop again.
I’ll bet it has a really big dipstick.
Maybe it identified as a 737 Max 8 or Max 9. All things are possibe in the modern times.
bet one oiler, with a rag, could read the oil level in the engines.
Well, you had to be there to understand.
Oils well that ends well.
Yeah, this was an elemental Systems failure.
MAN obviously has a glaringly-crappy SOVAT routine to miss this one.
IMO they probably removed the oil reservoir baffles to save fuel.
Sucks to be them.
No excuses on the ocean.
But I’m with Viking on the Go/No Go decision for the storm. If the ship doesn’t sail insurance wont cover. If the ship sinks insurance covers. Always sail.
Systems Operation Verification And Testing.
There go the careers of the Chief Engineer and the Captain.
Learn to code.
Most hiperf cars have complex windage and baffle trays to keep oil available at the bottom of the pan for pickup. Maybe those ship engines werent speced to operate in extremely rough seas, so, no elaborate oil system or a system designed for a dry sump. Just conjecture.
I wonder if the Genie Lamp came on at the bridge console:)
Learn to lubricate.
No thst wpuld be not enough gender fluid.
Yeah, just joking. The system shut down, hopefully before serious damage.
I was going to post about getting a new Chief Operating Engineer, But you beat me to it!
Or...Maybe the oil levels were OK and some faulty sensor told the computer oil was low, and the computer control system shut down the engines...?
Just speculating, but with the recent Boeing sensor/system problems this could also be a possibility...
Lots of automation replacing human “eyes-on” these days...Old timer pilots lament younger flight officers know more about computer systems than what makes the plane fly and how to manually respond when a problem presents...Could it be maritime systems have analogous problems cropping up?
Hi-perf engines use an oil tank and don’t rely on a wet sump.
How would a navigational error cause the engine to fail?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.