You cannot obstruct for a crime that never existed.
If Trump says the crime is BS, is that obstruction?
Because that’s what the democrats and media now want people to believe.
But it WAS BS, Trump was right, and he had NO obligation to help them make up a crime that didn’t exist.
Attorney General Barr and Rod Rosenstein both agreed on this, and NOW the democrats and media want to say Barr “rushed to judgment”?
Get real!
No collusion means no obstruction.
I think that’s what it boils down to: obstruction is when you try to prevent the law from addressing your crime. If you committed no crime, no matter how you act, you’re not obstructing by definition. I mean, who ever heard of anyone being prosecuted for trying to prevent investigators from discovering his innocence?
THis is a big big win. I thought that special counsel was going to sit out there forever slinging darts at whatever is going on.