Posted on 03/24/2019 4:13:41 PM PDT by Liz
--SNIP--what did Obama and his admin do, and why did they do it? The task falls to Trump's new AG, William Barr. Barr has said he was not satisfied the FBI and the Obama DOJ had been fully held accountable. This would mean a criminal probe of Comey, his deputy, McCabe, and others in the FBI leadership. If they failed to disclose to the FISA court that Clinton’s team commissioned and paid for the Russian dossier and that its allegations were unverified when they sought court approval to spy on the Trump campaign, they may have committed felonies, as did those who authorized misleading and falsified court applications, including Rosenstein.
Would also mean uncovering any role played by the reprehensible John Brennan, then head of the CIA, James Clapper, head of national intelligence, and Susan Rice, Obama’s NSA, in creating the FBI probe and leaking classified information.
Among the questions they need to be asked under oath is, <><> Did you have any role in spreading the Clinton-funded dossier to the media? <><> Did you leak the names of Trump associates picked up on wiretaps?
There are also fundamental doubts about the integrity of the FBI’s investigation of Hillary’s handling of classified e-mails.....and what role then AG Loretta Lynch, played in the exoneration of Clinton.
The best and only fair solution is for Barr to appoint a new special counsel. Unlike the costly Mueller probe, this S/C should be focused on credible allegations against Clinton and top Obama officials. And it must be completed before 2020 election so voters know the whole story of what happened in 2016 and the early days of the Trump presidency before they vote again.
Then, and only then, can we say that our long national nightmare is over.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Bless you!!
______________
Me too.
“I hope they treat the rats the way they treated Manafort. ... Then let the fun begin.”
Y’know, Alcatraz is just sitting there all empty, and there’s a ton of space to house all the evildoers. Maybe throw some paint on the walls, and incarcerate the whole bunch of ‘em.
Wouldn’t it be delicious knowing that every time HRH Hillary had to relieve herself she’d have to do it in front of prison guards? Little Miss Uppity should fall that far.
“And finally, The One, OBOZO! Oh I know it’s wishful thinking but I can dream can’t i?!”
Well, it could be possible, and you’re not the only one thinking this. Last night on Fox, Ari Fleischer said basically the same thing and used Obama’s name. If it’s in Ari’s mind, others are considering it, too.
“I’ve been asking this since the beginning of this fiasco: Why is no one asking ‘What did Obama know and when did he know it?’”
Ari Fleischer asked that last night, so it’s “a thing” in minds of people in DC. I’m hopeful that it doesn’t end there.
“Y’know, Alcatraz is just sitting there all empty, and there’s a ton of space to house all the evildoers.”
Send them all to Club Gitmo. This way the MSM can complain that because of a Republican Congress Obama couldn’t shut the place down.
thanks, thinden
What did Obama know and when did he know it?
He knew it all and at least since the 2012 election...
https://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/03/13/fusion-gps-romney-investigation
The Barack Obama presidential campaign hired Fusion GPS in 2012 to dig up dirt on Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, according to a book released on Tuesday
The Obama campaign hid its payments to Fusion GPS through its law firm, Perkins Coie. The arrangement is similar to the one that the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee used to pay Fusion for its investigation of then-candidate Donald Trump in 2016.
Attempting a coup against a duly elected President is a form of treason. These folks need to be interviewed ... under oath.
For those paying attention we were made aware of the other ongoing investigations months ago,
Some just choose to believe that cause nothing has leaked nothing is happening.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
JORDAN: I’m more concerned about why Mr. Rosenstein didn’t give us the information when he first got it. It seems to me
he should have
Let me go to something else here. How many different investigations do you have going on right now? Are you looking at — you’re looking
at Mr. Comey. You’re looking at FISA — official abuse of the FISA court process. And are you looking at the leak issue with — with the FBI? Are you — have (ph) you got three other ones going on?
HOROWITZ: We’ve got lots of investigations going on, but it’s...
JORDAN: Well I know, but relative to this stuff — I know you’ve got lots, but...
(CROSSTALK)
HOROWITZ: Yes, we’re looking at the leak issue, as well. That’s ongoing.
JORDAN: So all three of those...
HOROWITZ: Remain ongoing.
(CROSSTALK)
JORDAN: ... within ongoing investigations, right? Do you
— do you have any idea when — I’m particularly — well, I’m interested in all of them, but I’m particularly interested in the FISA — potential abuse of the FISA process. Do you have any idea when that one will be complete?
HOROWITZ: I don’t, Congressman. In part — as you know, a few weeks ago we were asked to broaden that and look at some additional information and issues.
JORDAN: Do you anticipate it taking 18 months, like this Clinton investigation one (ph) did, Mr. Horowitz?
HOROWITZ: I don’t anticipate it. But let me just say, if we had released this report in January, you would not have most of these text messages.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Exchange starts at about 11 minutes 45 seconds
People are being deliberately confused by the misuse of the expression "special counsel" and how a true, regulatory special counsel is used.
We also need to reiterate......
This is the United States of America........sitting presidents DO NOT spy on opposition candidates.
Then, and only then, can we say that our long national nightmare is over.
It won’t be over until “the media” eats crow. Which will never happen unless it is sued for all its worth, and SCOTUS allows the suit to go forward.Conventional wisdom is that SCOTUS will never do that because it would entail overturning its unanimous 1964 New York Times v. Sullivan decision. But Sullivan never addressed what is now known to be the real world. The eponymous Mr. Sullivan was not a Republican or a (conventional) Democrat - he was a southern Democrat, thus an unsympathetic figure and a perfect target.
In 1964 “bias in the media” was not a current topic. Not because the bias didn’t exist, but to the contrary - it was so strong that it was the air we all breathed, and we scarcely noticed it. Complaints of “bias in the media” only became a current topic when Walter Cronkite flipped on Vietnam after Tet in 1967.
Facts germane to the issue addressed in Sullivan but not before the court include
- the fact that the wire services homogenize journalism, and
- the fact that homogenized journalism, cynical about society and naive about government, is joined at the hip to the Democrat Party, and it attempts to silence conservative voices.
Chinese dictator Mao summarized the import of the First Amendment in his insincere but eloquent statement, “Let a hundred flowers bloom, let a hundred thoughts contend.” The effect of Sullivan is not, as its authors so fondly boasted, the protection of anti big government voices but the suppression of them.
“Then, and only then, can we say that our long national nightmare is over”.
Ahhhh, not so fast.
There is a matter of the sale of some 20% of America’s URANIUM to a “hostile foreign power” by the Clinton’s.
That MUST be dealt with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.