Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wildbill

It is just like with the Bible, Josephus, et cetera:

Do not trust the people who lived then, or shortly thereafter; oh no, only trust academics two thousand - or more - years removed.

It was once fashionable to categorically denounce the historicity of the Bible because the Hittite Empire was clearly mythical.

Then they found Hattushah, its capital... so they just moved on to the Next Big Reason to denounce the historicity of the Bible.

Academics are typically disingenuous anti-Christian snobs.


15 posted on 03/23/2019 6:40:47 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: YogicCowboy

There are many archeological discoveries that support the Bible. And none that refute it. There are undiscovered things, but, as you said, when artifacts or cities are unearthed, they support the text of the Bible. One day, Noah’s ark will be located and then real fireworks will happen.


20 posted on 03/23/2019 7:58:01 PM PDT by JohnEBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: YogicCowboy
That's not what happened.

When Hattusas was discovered, the Old Testament "Hittite" name was used to label its empire.

26 posted on 03/23/2019 10:30:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (this tagline space is now available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson