[SeekAndFind]

Here's the thing about it: Moore is a free marketer. He's as tough as they come. He believes in this stuff, and putting him on the Fed board means the Fed is likely to shift more to a free market stance to ensure more economic growth. That's good news for us in the private sector. I've worked with Moore myself back when I was an Investor's Business Daily writer and he's terrific. I've never disagreed with him on anything, and he's very clear and articulate in explaining how the real world works. He's been focused heavily on the states (read: The Flyover) in many of his opinion pieces and that's who he's going to be looking out for while he's at the Fed. Is that good news for us? Yup, yup, yup.

[chris37]

If only he literally melted, it would be so much better.

[Does so]

And your opinion of Krugman (on the first term of Trump’s Presidency)?

[CharleysPride]

I don’t care about this guys past — when Obama was in he was an inflation Hawk, an opinion which he has no disowned.

If he is loyal and will follow a rational growth policy that is enough. I prefer supplicants to deep thinkers in the role to be honest.

Thank God, that maniac Jerome Corsi has come to his senses.
Probably too late, but better than never.

[Does so]

"At that point, Krugman chose to release a blog post in which he predicted these jitters represented a new permanent reality in the U.S. economy."

“It really does now look like President Donald J. Trump, and markets are plunging. When might we expect them to recover?” Krugman said in his post. “If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.”

[Moonman62]

Yet Krugman and many others have no problem with a Fed that’s caused many recessions and cost us several trillions of dollars in lost economic opportunity. It’s about time we get some outsiders into the Fed.

[outinyellowdogcountry]

” I’ve never disagreed with him on anything, and he’s very clear and articulate in explaining how the real world works. He’s been focused heavily on the states (read: The Flyover) in many of his opinion pieces and that’s who he’s going to be looking out for while he’s at the Fed. Is that good news for us? Yup, yup, yup.”

Indeed it sounds like a great move. How many economists exist like Moore? Need more Moore!

[fhayek]

Krugman hate him. That’s enough for me to get a man crush. Maybe Fed chairman some day?

[circlecity]

“Amazing. Moore isn't just a hack, with terrible judgment. He's a hack who has repeatedly shown himself unable even to get basic facts right“

Physician heal thyself.

[Rusty0604]

Love it! Thanks for posting.

[cotton1706]

Krugman isn’t melting down, he’s looking to influence senate votes.

[MarkL]

How about that global stock market meltdown predicted by Krugman should candidate Trump be elected, as predicted by Krugman.

Krugman is proof of the saying that we could take all the economists and all the meteorologists in the world, have them switch jobs, and nobody would notice a difference (with the possible exception of people who’s lives depend on accurate weather forecasts.)

He’s been “so bigly” wrong so many times, about so many things, it’s just more proof that the NY Slimes doesn’t give a hoot about accurate reporting.

Mark

[SteveH]

change you can believe in!

lolol

[Pearls Before Swine]

Professional jealousy.

And, Krugman acts as a party shill far more than as an economist these days.

[donozark]

Wonder how Senate will react? Will they confirm him or “go Kavanaugh” on him?

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

If Krugman said it was going to rain I would confidently grab my sunglasses and leave the umbrella in the car.

[Citizen Soldier]

Krugmqan is an idiot asshole. I really like Moore. Glad he was named.