Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

To stop the Wall from going up, the courts would hear arguments for a temporary injunction. The argument would need to explain the President’s emergency is not an emergency. In so doing the court would set precedent by defining to the executive branch what is and what is not an emergency. In effect, the courts would assume the powers of the Presidency.


15 posted on 03/21/2019 2:46:55 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

would it get this far? if i were a judge i would be tempted to say i did not have jurisdiction due to the separation of powers or something like that...


17 posted on 03/21/2019 2:55:09 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage

would it get this far? if i were a judge i would be tempted to say i did not have jurisdiction due to the separation of powers or something like that...


18 posted on 03/21/2019 2:55:09 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson