Skip to comments.
Missouri Senate Bans All Federal Gun Control Laws in Proposed Bill
The Sentinel ^
| March 19, 2019
| Max Headroom
Posted on 03/20/2019 2:58:06 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 last
To: Pride in the USA
101
posted on
03/21/2019 7:29:35 PM PDT
by
lonevoice
(diagonally parked in a parallel universe)
To: Cold Heart
Went down in flames. Too many lefties with guns. That bill was the wet dream of a bunch of Lake Oswego high school kids.
102
posted on
03/21/2019 8:16:03 PM PDT
by
gundog
( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
To: Mollypitcher1
2nd says “shall not be infringed “ That means the Supreme Court, too
103
posted on
03/21/2019 8:20:30 PM PDT
by
gundog
( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Like its predecessor, SB613, Bill SB367 and its companion, House Bill HB786, would prevent all state agencies and their employees from enforcing any federal law that infringes the Second Amendment in any way, See also Missouri House Bill 11-08. It's the one that REQUIRES all Missourians of military age to obtain and keep an AR-15 type rifle for any necessary duty in an emergency.
104
posted on
03/22/2019 9:38:29 AM PDT
by
archy
(Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, then eat you.)
To: metmom
The Second Amendment should help in this case. I dont see how the federal government can make any guns laws considering they are forbidden to by the Constitution.An act of the legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void.
-U.S. Supreme Court, Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1803
An unconstutional act is not law; it confers no rights. It imposes no duties, affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as though it had never been passed.
- Norton v Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 1886
105
posted on
03/22/2019 12:28:48 PM PDT
by
archy
(Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, then eat you.)
To: Mollypitcher1
The next appointment by Trump will seal the deal. Maybe, if it's Hardiman. But if Ruth Bader-Meinhoff is the next to assume room temperature, President Trump will be under enormous pressure to replace her with a female justice, because Ginsberg was a woman, and women deserve a female replacement for *the woman's seat* on the Court.*.
Of course, he might as well poke all his foes in the eye with a sharp stick in one fell swoop. I suspect as much will be made of the replacement's views on Roe v. Wade as over the Second Amendment. We shall see.
106
posted on
03/22/2019 12:37:39 PM PDT
by
archy
(Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, then eat you.)
To: archy
Nice.....
That’s a keeper.
107
posted on
03/22/2019 1:02:35 PM PDT
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: archy
Is something wrong with Barrett? I am leery of women justices too, however, there ARE women who love the Second Amendment and our right to keep and bear arms.
...like ME.
108
posted on
03/23/2019 7:38:41 PM PDT
by
Mollypitcher1
(I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
To: Mollypitcher1
Is something wrong with Barrett? I am leery of women justices too, however, there ARE women who love the Second Amendment and our right to keep and bear arms.
Amy Coney is married to Jesse M. Barrett, an Assistant United States Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana. That district has not been particularly friendly to Hoosier supporters of the Second Amendment.
That does not mean that her decisions on the Supreme Court would necessarily mirror her husband's past record, but her history is absent of any particularly supportive writings on the matter as well. INgo.
109
posted on
04/02/2019 11:39:22 AM PDT
by
archy
(Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, then eat you.)
To: archy
Thanks for the information. We must have a solid supporter of the 2nd and the entire Constitution AS WRITTEN.
110
posted on
04/02/2019 8:00:47 PM PDT
by
Mollypitcher1
(I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
To: gundog
I agree. It is up to the SC to uphold the entire Constitution AS Written.
111
posted on
04/02/2019 8:03:55 PM PDT
by
Mollypitcher1
(I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson