Skip to comments.
Judge says Trump cannot implement transgender military policy
The Hill ^
| 3/19/19
| Rebecca Kheel
Posted on 03/19/2019 3:10:32 PM PDT by Revel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: bert
The judge should have no say in the matter and should be militarily detained in GITMO as a matter of national security.
41
posted on
03/19/2019 3:30:28 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Make American Intelligence Great Again.)
To: Dalberg-Acton
Shes 75-years old. Time to retire and let trump replace her. Nice 40-year old conservative judge.
42
posted on
03/19/2019 3:30:55 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: central_va
it means, “in case you missed it.” Most of these acronyms are easily identified when you search for them.
43
posted on
03/19/2019 3:31:59 PM PDT
by
be-baw
To: Secret Agent Man
Democrats definitely will.
44
posted on
03/19/2019 3:32:28 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: Electric Graffiti
Agreed but is there a recourse around the courts without violating laws that dems will jupp all over?
45
posted on
03/19/2019 3:33:22 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
To: savedbygrace
USSC ruled on it?
I don’t know a whole lot about the federal court system so i’m not putting anymore cents in :)
46
posted on
03/19/2019 3:34:02 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
To: Electric Graffiti
ICYMI = not a real acronym.
47
posted on
03/19/2019 3:34:23 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Revel
48
posted on
03/19/2019 3:34:39 PM PDT
by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
To: Revel
Hyphenated name. All you need to know.
49
posted on
03/19/2019 3:35:00 PM PDT
by
CincyRichieRich
(But the noble man makes noble plans, and by noble deeds they stand. Isaiah 32:8)
To: be-baw
50
posted on
03/19/2019 3:35:30 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
I understood that. I’m getting good at this.
51
posted on
03/19/2019 3:36:37 PM PDT
by
be-baw
To: Revel
The judge is trying to drag it out as long as possible until the hammer comes down and the decision is reversed. That’s what these kinds of judges do ... roadblock after roadblock, to slow down Trump’s progress ... which is inevitable, in any case.
52
posted on
03/19/2019 3:36:51 PM PDT
by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: Electric Graffiti
The supremes ruled that Trump can proceed with his tranny ban. You oppose that?
53
posted on
03/19/2019 3:37:30 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: Innovative
She was and doesn’t seem to care.
54
posted on
03/19/2019 3:40:26 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I don’t remember electing her POTUS either.
55
posted on
03/19/2019 3:40:46 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(My tagline ran off with another man.)
To: OKSooner
“Actually it would seem that I did miss it. What’s up? “
A massive conspiracy of high treason(multiple plots to overthrow a lawfully elected POTUS). So large now it includes sitting ‘ambassadors’. No one has been brought to justice, either. Mueller is still on the hunt(coup). The radical left in charge of social media and big tech are starting to censor deplorables in earnest. Fox is in enemy hands and tacking hard to the left. The dems and GOP are united against PDJT and now the courts are increasing their unconstitutional edicts.
Almost like this crap is being coordinated from behind the scenes /roll eyes
56
posted on
03/19/2019 3:43:31 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Cocked, locked and ready to ROCK!)
To: dp0622
“Agreed but is there a recourse around the courts without violating laws”
The courts are violating the law—the Constitution of the United States and the separation of powers.
The dems will impeach PDJT for anything.
57
posted on
03/19/2019 3:46:50 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Cocked, locked and ready to ROCK!)
To: Revel
Tell the judge to stuff it. No one elected these guys.
58
posted on
03/19/2019 3:47:30 PM PDT
by
myerson
To: DesertRhino
Yes, since it isn’t their call.
59
posted on
03/19/2019 3:48:26 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Cocked, locked and ready to ROCK!)
To: Revel
It is just a temporary technicality.
The judge can’t revoke the injunction until the plaintiff has had a certain time to review the case (by March 29th) - so the injunction technically is still in force.
The fact that it was overruled means that there is no mystery about the outcome, just the effective date.
60
posted on
03/19/2019 3:50:05 PM PDT
by
BeauBo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson