I bet you think Twitter is fair to everyone
There is circumstantial evidence. Brat’s assistant tweeted his outrage. Faux released the obligatory statement about bigotry. Pirro was off air on Saturday. No Faux host has whispered her name
“There is circumstantial evidence.”
Not really.
There is only cause for suspicion. That’s it.
“I bet you think Twitter is fair to everyone”
Why did you say this?
Do you believe it contributes to your argument? Does it somehow enhance your position?
Or does it just cover your own shortcomings?