Back in ‘64 they used the argument of public accommodations to get the thing passed. Find for the plaintiffs here and some yahoo will soon be claiming that his religion won’t let him rent to black people. Not the same thing I know, but that’s enough to scare the courts away from this.
“Back in ‘64 they used the argument of public accommodations to get the thing passed.”
It was unconstitutional but now the courts are going to extend the encroachment on private property and the freedom of association to include any victim group under the sun. Wonderful.