Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cymbeline

“In normal flight the wings don’t need to be as large as they need to be during takeoff and landing.”

Yeah that is why we have flaps. Don’t quit your day job.

It is more to do with larger engines and the desire but Boeing and Airlines to not retrain pilots. This post is one of the best explanations I have seen so far.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3734243/posts?page=32#32


22 posted on 03/18/2019 8:30:42 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TalonDJ

“Yeah that is why we have flaps. Don’t quit your day job.”

I mentioned flaps in my post. I think comparing the 737 MAX’s wings with the older 737’s wings, flaps or no flaps, the 737 MAX’s wings are smaller.

A quote from the article you reference: “The fact that this airplane requires such jury rigging to fly is a red flag”

I wonder how the engines-off rate of descent of the two planes compare. I’ll bet the MAX drops like a rock.

After all’s said and done Boeing ends up with a huge PR problem. It’s a trickier plane to fly. The automation solution might make flying it even more tricky. Training probably is a cure.

Final result: we’ll get an even better MAX and Boeing will lose a few billion dollars.


24 posted on 03/18/2019 9:30:49 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson