To: Sopater
I agree that Red Light laws violate the Constitution, but the headline is not validated by the article.
There is nothing in the article showing that any Republicans favor a nationwide Red Light law. It only says that Sen. Graham is holding hearings on it, and doesn’t mention any other Republicans. It doesn’t even say whether Graham supports such a law.
To: savedbygrace
What is it that we need to “hear” about such laws?
28 posted on
03/14/2019 7:54:31 AM PDT by
chris37
(No wall? No vote.)
To: savedbygrace
It only says that Sen. Graham is holding hearings on it, Why the hell is he "holding hearings" on the topic? No possible good could come of such idiocy.
33 posted on
03/14/2019 8:05:05 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: savedbygrace
There is nothing in the article showing that any Republicans favor a nationwide Red Light law. It only says that Sen. Graham is holding hearings on it, and doesn’t mention any other Republicans. It doesn’t even say whether Graham supports such a law.
This is not the only news article on this subject. Marco Rubio has submitted a red-flag bill in the Senate and President Trump has even gone so far as to say that he supports taking the guns first and going through due process second.
35 posted on
03/14/2019 8:06:07 AM PDT by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson