Ummm, that's the case law I was referring to... it's not just 'norms' of corrupt liberals - there's laws on the books... and precedents . Every managing editor in the country has his 'First Amendment' lawyer on speed dial...
The 'polite society' BS of liberals is NOT a factor in a court of law. CNN and the Washington Post are going down.
It isn’t that I want to protect any of the liberal mouthpieces that have gotten away with this for many years by hiding behind the liberal appointed judges, far from it. All I’m saying is that whoever represents him better keep it to the facts of the case: that he was liabled, not that he is a child which is what the videos was leaning toward. And with the ability of the court to determine it’s validity and not containing anything but eyewash to sway jurists for the wrong reason due to its lack of content, I hope it doesn’t damage the efforts of the attorney for the plaintiff if it gets shown in court at all. (Or if it even makes it to court)
rwood