Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here's What Lisa Page Had to Say About That FBI 'Insurance Policy'
Townhall.com ^ | March 13, 2019 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 03/13/2019 10:15:03 AM PDT by Kaslin

Former FBI attorney Lisa Page, who conspired with fired FBI agent Peter Strzok to stop Donald Trump if he won the presidency, testified in front of a closed door session on Capitol Hill last year. Now her testimony has been released, showing the extent to which the duo was willing to go with their efforts. It reveals the "insurance policy" discussed in text messages was likely Robert Mueller's Special Counsel investigation.

"If he is not elected, then, to the extent that the Russians were colluding with members of his team, we're still going to investigate that even without him being President, because any time the Russians do anything with a U.S. person, we care, and it's very serious to us," Page said about her thinking under questioning from former Congressman Trey Gowdy. "But if he becomes President, that totally changes the game because now he is President of the United States. He's going to immediately start receiving classified briefings. He's going to be exposed to the most sensitive secrets imaginable. And if there is somebody on his team who wittingly or unwittingly is working with the Russians, that is super serious."

Text messages found between Page and Strzok, with whom she was having an affair, discuss a meeting in fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe's office to go over an "insurance policy." A number of other messages showed Strzok and Page repeatedly slamming Trump and his supporters while favoring the election of Hillary Clinton.

Further, her testimony reveals there was no evidence of collusion at the time the Special Counsel investigation was launched in May 2017. Nearly two years later, there is still no evidence.

The newly released transcripts of my interview with Lisa Page indicate that Peter Strzok had no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia prior to the launch of the FBI and special counsel investigations into the matter. pic.twitter.com/Mt8SChdocI— John Ratcliffe (@RepRatcliffe) March 13, 2019

As a reminder, the Department of Justice Inspector General found the anti-Trump messages exchanged between Page and Strzok to be deeply troubling. From a report released in August 2018:

"During the course of the review, the OIG discovered text messages and instant messages between some FBI employees on the investigative team, conducted using FBI mobile devices and computers, that expressed statements of hostility toward then candidate Donald Trump and statements of support for then candidate Clinton," the report states. "We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations."

"Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, 'No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it' in response to her question '[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!', it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice," the report continues.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: coup; coupplot; deepstate; doj; ethics; fbi; lisapage; page; presidenttrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: butlerweave

“so the Dems think the US is a Banana Republic where the Russians can change elections ,LOL”

I wonder what gave them that idea.


81 posted on 03/15/2019 7:29:17 PM PDT by RipSawyer (I need some green first and then we'll talk a new deal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Liz
The dirt Hillary was supposed to sweep under the carpet is now in the hands of the man they tried to destroy.

The dirt Hillary and then Mueller was supposed to sweep under the rug is now in Trump's hands.

Poor Hillary

Poor Mueller

Poor Rosenstein

Poor HalfAfrican

ETC.

82 posted on 03/17/2019 11:38:28 AM PDT by politicianslie (OPTIMIST-Glass 1/2 full- PESSIMIST 1/2 empty TO ENGINEER, Glass is twice as big as it needs to be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer; butlerweave; All
“so the Dems think the US is a Banana Republic where the Russians can change elections ,LOL” I wonder what gave them that idea.

In 2007, Glenn Simpson wrote a NY SLIMES article (and others too) that warned of Russian interference potential in US elections. It mentioned some of the same players that are in today's scams.

BREIBART Report: Russia ‘Dossier’ Based on 10-Year-Old Wall Street Journal Articles

Obama's FBI ran with the scam, Bush's FBI did NOT! This is all going to go to Obama as he probably gave the green light to it all. We just need the evidence to show that is what happened. It is WHY no arrests have yet been made.

Did Obama read Hillary's DOSSIER in August, 2016? The answer is PROBABLY YES. What did the Muslim loving scumbag with a fake BC know and when did he know it?

Hey Susan Rice, it was all by the book, right?

#LOCKTHEMALLUP

83 posted on 03/17/2019 12:16:15 PM PDT by politicianslie (OPTIMIST-Glass 1/2 full- PESSIMIST 1/2 empty TO ENGINEER, Glass is twice as big as it needs to be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I want the UN commission on human rights to investigate. /s/


84 posted on 03/17/2019 8:40:09 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice,” the report continues. <<<

Ya Think!....lol....I guess TREASON would be “antithetical” also....

Kinda like.... electronic records reveal that Strzok changed the language from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” scrubbing a key word that could have had legal ramifications for Clinton.

85 posted on 03/18/2019 9:28:15 AM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Where does that come from?

Those e-mails from the FBI *MIDWAY* investigation into various FBI DC Headquarters Staff [AKA the *Sultans of the Seventh Floor*, though in this particular example it was from a member of the fourth floor Operations Center staff, regarding the various means by which the President could be deposed or eliminated.

The FBI [NOT the Secret Service, inverstigated itself and as usual, found it had done nothing wrong:

Before the Justice Department's inspector general report came out, virulently anti-Trump texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page had already become public — except for a particularly troubling exchange revealed by the IG for the first time. That's the one, sent in August 2016, in which Page says Trump's "not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" To which Stzork promises: "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."

Less discussed, but just as important, are the texts between FBI agents identified by the IG only as "Agent 1" and "Agent 5."

Both played key roles in the Clinton email "investigation," both were at Clinton's interview, and both repeatedly admitted their utter disdain for Trump and their belief that the Clinton probe was a huge waste of time. In addition, there's the mysterious anti-Trump Attorney 2, who was involved with both the Clinton email and Trump Russia investigations.

At a hearing on Tuesday, IG Michael Horowitz said the FBI wants the names. (Rep. Mark Meadows claims that names of two of them — Agent 5 and Attorney 2 — are Sally Moyer and Kevin Clinesmith.)

After reviewing their texts, the IG concluded that all five "brought discredit to themselves, sowed doubt about the FBI's handling of the Midyear investigation, and impacted the reputation of the FBI." ("Midyear" was the code name used for the Clinton email probe.)

No kidding.

Here, for example, are texts sent by Agent 1 throughout FBI's alleged Clinton investigation.

Sept. 2, 2015: "the most meaningless thing I've ever done with people acting like f***ing 9/11."

Sept. 25, 2015: "I dont care about it. I think its continued waste of resources and time and focus ..."

Oct. 26, 2015: "Its just so obvious how pointless this exercise is."

Jan. 15, 2016: Responding to a question of when the investigation would be finished, Agent 1 stated, "my guess is March. Doesnt matter what we have, political winds will want to beat the Primarys."

Jan. 28, 2016: " Alot of work and bulls**t for a political exercise."

Feb. 1, 2016: "This is the biggest political s**t show of them all. No substance. Up at dawn — pride swallowing seige."

Feb. 2, 2016: "Going well ... Busy, and sometimes I feel for naught (political exercise), but I feel good ..."

Feb. 9: "You guys have a sh**ty task, in a sh**ty environment. To look for something conjured in a place where you cant find it, for a case that doesnt matter and is predestined."

May 6, 2016, to Agent 5: "pretty bad news today ... someone has breathed some political urgency into this." (May 6 was the day news broke that the FBI was likely to interview Clinton "in the next few weeks.") Just before Agent 1 interviewed Clinton, he sent a text saying: "We have nothing — shouldn't even be interviewing. My god ... I'm actually starting to have embarrassment sprinkled on my disappointment ... Ever been forced to do something you adamantly opposed."

After conducting that interview, Agent 1 texted: "I'm done interviewing the President" — referring to Clinton.

There's also the fact that Agent 1 found what he believed to be instances of people lying to the FBI — including Hillary Clinton — but did nothing.

The IG report says that Agent 1 interviewed "a witness who assisted the Clintons at their Chappaqua residence." Here's the exchange after the interview:

FBI Employee: "boom ... how did the (witness) go" Agent 1: "Awesome. Lied his ass off."

In addition, after interviewing Clinton, Agent 1 admitted that Clinton's claim that she didn't know what the "C" marking meant on a classified document was "hard to impossible to believe."

In other words, he believed she lied.

As to Agent 5, she's just as bad. At one point she texts Agent 1 referring to Trump's "supporters like the ones from ohio that are retarded".

b On Election Day, she texted that Clinton "better win ... otherwise i'm gonna be walking around with both of my guns … and likely quitting on the spot". Later she sent a text saying "f(---) trump."/b

Other Nuggets Of Bias

The IG report unearthed other such nuggets, such as the text from "FBI Attorney 2," who said after the November election: "Viva le resistance."

So who are these FBI officials? Why do they get to remain anonymous when others, like Page and Stzork, are already public? Are they still at the FBI? If so, what are they doing?

This week, eight lawmakers sent a letter to the IG demanding the names.

"These individuals need to be held accountable and only transparency will ensure that action," the letter states.

Naturally, when the IG confronted these FBI officials with their texts, they all denied up and down that their views about the investigation or about Clinton and Trump in any way, shape, or form colored their efforts.

Right.

Yet, somehow the IG swallowed their excuses so it could report finding no bias in the investigation, a claim that stretched credulity with increasing strength the closer one looks at the report itself.

Which leads to the next burning question about this report: Was it watered down by officials at Justice and the FBI who were able to review it before it got published?

FBI Tinkering?

Earlier this month, Rep. Andy Biggs sent a letter to the IG asking to see original drafts of the report.

"We are concerned that during this time, people may have changed the report in a way that obfuscates your findings," the letter, signed by two other congressmen, says.

Meadows says he believes the FBI officials also may have altered documentation of witness interviews. Given the recent track record of these highly politicized agencies, these lawmakers are right to want to see any such changes.

Related IBD article

86 posted on 03/22/2019 9:55:44 AM PDT by archy (Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, then eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: politicianslie
Poor Hillary

Poor Mueller

Poor Rosenstein

Poor HalfAfrican

Poor Alan Kreuger!

87 posted on 03/22/2019 10:00:38 AM PDT by archy (Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, then eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: archy

Most of us have believed the FBI has been corrupt since 11/22/63.

Thanks for your hard work.


88 posted on 03/25/2019 7:14:29 AM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson