Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coronal

They probably de-emphasized gunnery because of the Lomng Lance.


21 posted on 03/13/2019 9:48:35 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Reily

Actually Jap naval fire control was mostly optical with some radar ranging. It wasn’t that bad, in fact their night vision stuff was state of the art for the time period. Engaging the Jap Navy at night was death sentence for the first 3 years of the war.


22 posted on 03/13/2019 9:51:41 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Reily

For a cruiser or destroyer, perhaps. But battleships exist to carry and fire their guns. I would imagine that gunnery expertise would be a top priority on a battleship. As I understand it one of the issues at Samar was that the Japanese overestimated the size and speed of their targets which would lead to errors in calculating their shots.


23 posted on 03/13/2019 9:51:59 AM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson