The guy is complaining about documentation. Nobody writes documentation in the 21st century. You go on Stack Exchange and ask the other pilots how it works. Maybe someone who speaks broken english can give you a hint.
The guy is complaining about documentation.
It’s possible there are some kinks that need to be worked out of the new tech, but it took hundreds of thousands of takeoffs and landings to get here. They’re not falling out of the sky.
Wow. The ignorance of this statement is stupefying.
Have you ever even seen the amount of documentation that come with a commercial aircraft? It numbers in the THOUSANDS of pages.
Did Boeing and the FAA screw up by not including new information on the system in question? Maybe.
I say maybe because the whole POINT was to NOT change the flying qualities to such a degree that the pilots would need to retrain to fly this aircraft. The procedure to disable the system in question is EXACTLY like that of the previous system.
There is ZERO difference between the controls.
In time we hopefully will know what happened in BOTH crashes, but the speculation fairy needs to STOP.
People have died folks. Shooting your mouth off helps no one. And for you speculation fairies, even a cursory reading of the events of this latest crash and with several of the eye witness accounts, while any eye witness account is suspect, stating there was a debris trail PRIOR to ground impact. Let the investigators work. As to the groundings, those in charge of each countries airspace are not incompetent and some have valid fears. They have taken appropriate action as they see fit a has the FAA. Suck it up cupcake.