[Pontiac]

Judge Helene White wrote in her dissent that the law “would result in an undue burden on a woman’s right to obtain non-therapeutic abortions if imposed directly.”

What would be an undue burden on a woman’s right to obtain non-therapeutic abortions?

Women that want face lifts or nose jobs must pay for these procedures themselves because they are “non-therapeutic”. These procedures are not necessary to sustain life or health.

Almost all abortions are non-therapeutic. The neither mother’s life nor health are threatened by the pregnancy coming to term.

Almost all abortions are simply because the mother does not want the child. A matter that can be resolved by giving the child up for adoption.

The state has no vital interest in promoting or subsidizing abortion.

[jazusamo]

Yep...Saw an article the other day that some top doctors agreed there’s virtually no condition that threatens the mothers life that justifies abortion because of C-sections.

Sounded reasonable to me.