Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino

That used to be the case. Now the President must ask for rescission of funds but it is rarely, if ever, granted by Congress. See Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 which changed the law.


3 posted on 03/11/2019 6:18:25 PM PDT by Lakewood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lakewood

If that’s the case, then the new game in town is called he has at least a minuscule degree of discretion on how it’s spent. Some things get slow walk, some awards go to organizations not specifically prohibited, but never intended to get money from the state department grants. I think there’s a million ways to punch back.


5 posted on 03/11/2019 6:20:38 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lakewood

A line item veto would solve this problem, something congress will never agree to.


6 posted on 03/11/2019 6:21:01 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lakewood

“That used to be the case. Now the President must ask for rescission of funds but it is rarely, if ever, granted by Congress. See Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 which changed the law.”

Has this been tested at SCOTUS?


14 posted on 03/11/2019 7:31:04 PM PDT by grumpygresh (The only check on a rogue DOJ and FBI is jury nullification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson