[blueyon]

“”’graphic evidence”””

Interesting choice of words......why would they come out with this phrase at this point and time...

[nh1]

That jumped out at me as well

[RitaOK]

Because “graphic evidence “ is Much more convincing and since it does Not exist, it lets Schif’ for brains Off the hook with his communist constituency more easily.

The US Senate would accept nothing less than Extremely graphic, before the would entertain the question. The Senate majority reaching 2/3 Vote is a high hurdle.

Dems LOSE it.

[saywhatagain]

I too find the term "graphic" interesting specially combined with how Schiff emphasized/paused when he said "graphic evidence" during the interview.

Since the beginning, Schiff has pushed the narrative "overwhelming evidence." Today, it becomes "graphic evidence"

Is he signaling someone/entity to release a video/audio tape?

Or, as some has suggested . . . POTUS has something on one of their own. Are they saying . . . POTUS . . . if you release that tape (graphic evidence), we will start grounds of impeachment???

I am not buying into any new data or lack thereof from the Mueller report. They have a direct link to counsel, so they already know/knew the contents.

[yesthatjallen]

Maybe they’re working on a DeepFake video.